Indexed by:  www.freefind.com 
 

[see CARA matters covered in "Help from the president?" at end of column]

The Advocate (Baton Rouge) - 10/9/00

Joan McKinney [column]

TAUZIN MEDIATING TIRE-LIABILITY LEGISLATION

How far will Congress go -- or will it go anywhere? -- to "criminalize" a manufacturer's failure to tell the public about defective tires and vehicles? In private negotiations late Friday, U.S. Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-Chackbay, was trying to tone down the answer to that explosive question.

It's explosive because government regulators have charged that defective Bridgestone/ Firestone tires have caused Ford Explorer SUVs to roll over, killing people. Some consumer groups and Congress members also charge that the SUVs are inherently unstable. Both companies deny that they knowingly sold defective products or that they were deliberately slow in reporting problems to government regulators.

A Tauzin-chaired subcommittee has recommended a tire/vehicle safety bill. That bill, revised somewhat by the full House Commerce Committee, may come to the House floor this week.

The Tauzin bill does beef up the powers of federal highway safety regulators, and it does provide criminal penalties -- fines and the possibility of jail -- for tire and vehicle manufacturers who cover up defective products.

However, the Tauzin bill also has some liability escape-hatches for executives who belatedly cooperate with government investigators.

This is "the only way to protect whistleblowers" or to persuade executives to quickly disclose information once a federal investigation is underway, says a Tauzin aide.

A tougher bill by Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, passed the Senate Commerce Committee two weeks ago, but it immediately hit a wall in the Senate where several of McCain's fellow Republicans blocked its consideration. The obstructionists either represent car and tire-making states, or they're conservatives who philosophically oppose both the expansion of federal regulations and the "blurring of civil and criminal law."

That phrase was spoken Friday by U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., as he blocked a procedural motion by McCain that would have nudged McCain's tire/vehicle bill toward a Senate vote. Sessions' public statement was an exception. Most senators who've put "holds" on the McCain bill have done so in secret, as Senate rules allow them to do.

A red-faced McCain accused Sessions of condoning highway deaths. "I hope he has an opportunity to talk to the relatives of those who have been killed and those who will be killed... by our failure to act," McCain said.

Almost immediately after McCain's flare-up, Tauzin appeared on the Senate floor. Tauzin was trying to mediate an agreement on procedure or a compromise on substance, according to his staff. But there was no obvious agreement before the Senate closed shop for the weekend.

***

Help from the president?

U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., was at the White House for an education discussion last week and used the visit to complain to President Clinton that last-minute spending legislation has gutted her proposal for permanent federal royalty sharing with oil and gas coastal states.

By Landrieu's account:

"Without any prompting from me, he said he was aware that the coastal piece and the wildlife piece were shortchanged."

"Coastal piece" and "wildlife piece" are code words. They refer to the Louisiana congressional delegation's attempt to get -- not just federal money -- but policy language saying that (1) state governments (not the federal government) should control how some federal funds are spent for wildlife purposes; (2) Louisiana and a few coastal states are owed something extra because they've allowed federal oil and gas drilling off their coastlines and have suffered environmental damages as a result.

Landrieu is trying to negotiate a "coastal impact" program and "a state wildlife piece" into a bill that would fund the Department of Commerce in fiscal 2001.

She supposes that Clinton will help her although she's also aware that some of Clinton's aides worked to kill her royalty-sharing bill. "I didn't bring that up with him. I hope I don't have to bring it up with him," Landrieu said.

***

The American Land Rights Association has attacked the heart of Louisiana's claim for royalty sharing. The association says:

"... Claims from Louisiana's delegation for 'coastal assistance' funds from oil royalties to mitigate the effects of oil drilling have almost no basis in science ... Louisiana is indeed losing wetlands. However, 85 percent to 90 percent of the reason for wetlands loss is levee construction on the Mississippi River, NOT oil industry activities."

The association represents private property owners who oppose the royalty-sharing bill, known as CARA, for Conservation and Reinvestment Act.

In addition to "coastal impact" royalty sharing, CARA would allocate billions in federal offshore royalties to a program of government land buying to protect the environment. ALRA says the government already owns too much land. It says CARA stands for Condemnation and Relocation Act.

Joan McKinney is The Advocate's Washington correspondent.

Be informed! Don't allow yourself to be snowed by CARA.

For More Information Contact:
American Land Rights Association
Tel: 360-687-3087
FAX: 360-687-2973

                            

Send mail to alra@pacifier.com with questions or comments about this web site.
All pages on this website are ©1999, American Land Rights Association. Permission is granted to use any and all information herein, as long as credit is given to ALRA.